Avon Products Inc. was ordered [ in a California talc lawsuit ] to pay $10.3 million in punitive damages to a woman who blamed her cancer on talc in its cosmetics, in the first such case the company has lost in US litigation.
The Los Angeles Superior Court jury that punished Avon Friday for hiding the risks that some of its talc-based powders can cause cancer had already awarded Rita Chapman $40 million in actual damages, bringing the total in the case to more than $50 million, according to court filings.
The $40 million award [ in this California talc lawsuit ] was intended to cover Chapman’s pain and medical costs tied to her battle with mesothelioma, a cancer specifically tied to asbestos exposure. Chapman alleged Avon’s powders contained asbestos-tainted talc that made her sick. The company — famous for its door-to-door saleswomen known as “Avon Ladies” — was acquired by Natura Cosmeticos SA in 2020.
“We are disappointed by this verdict and will vigorously pursue all available avenues to appeal,” Avon said in an emailed statement. “Avon is confident that it has strong grounds for appeal and will continue to defend its position.”[ Besides this California talc lawsuit ] Avon faced almost 130 talc suits as of 2020, according to court records. That same year, the company said it was removing talc from its products, which are now largely marketed outside the US.
In Chapman’s case, jurors concluded Avon management knew talc in the company’s products posed a cancer risk but failed to warn consumers, according to a copy of the verdict sheet. They also found Avon executives acted with “malice, oppression or fraud” in hiding the products’ health risks. That opened the company to the punishment award.
Chapman, a 76-year-old resident of Scottsdale, Arizona, who worked as a human-relations specialist with the Sears retail chain, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2021, according to court filings. She’d used some Avon powders that had high levels of asbestos. Evidence in the case showed the company was seeking to sell out of its stocks of those powders during the time Chapman used them.[Article continues at original source]
Asbestos-Mesothelioma Case Evaluation
Free. Confidential. No Obligation.