Law Offices of Thomas J. Lamb

  • Asbestos & Mesothelioma
  • Benzene Diseases
  • Camp Lejeune Cases
  • Drug Injury
  • Free Case Evaluation
  • About Us

Mesothelioma risk among those exposed to chrysotile asbestos only and mixtures that include amphibole: a case–control study in the USA, 1975–1980

November 5, 2020 By Law Offices of Thomas J. Lamb, P.A.

Objectives Occupational asbestos exposure is causally linked to mesothelioma. However, whether exposure to only chrysotile asbestos is associated with mesothelioma risk, and the heterogeneity in risk by different fibre types/lengths remains unclear. We investigated whether mesothelioma risk differs among workers exposed to only chrysotile asbestos compared with chrysotile and amphibole (ie, amosite, tremolite, anthophyllite and crocidolite) over the working lifetime.

Methods We analysed next-of-kin interview data including occupational histories for 580 white men (176 cases and 404 controls) from a case–control study of mesothelioma conducted in the USA in 1975–1980. Asbestos exposure was determined by an occupational hygienist using a job-exposure matrix and exposure categories included chrysotile only and nine chrysotile–amphibole mixtures. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the ORs and 95% CIs of mesothelioma, comparing each asbestos category to the unexposed group, adjusted for age at death and data source. Analysis of contrasts was used to assess overall heterogeneity and pair-wise differences in risk.

Results Exposure to long and short chrysotile only was associated with increased mesothelioma risk compared with the unexposed (OR=3.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 11.2)). The complex mixture of extra-long amosite, short and long chrysotile, tremolite and anthophyllite was associated with the highest risk (OR=12.8 (95% CI 4.1 to 40.2)). There was evidence for overall heterogeneity among the asbestos exposure categories (p heterogeneity=0.02). However, the lower risk observed for exposure to [ chrysotile asbestos ] only compared with the complex mixture was not significant (p difference=0.10).

Conclusions Our findings suggest that policies aimed at regulating asbestos should target both pure chrysotile and mixtures that include amphibole.

[View article at original source]

 Asbestos & Mesothelioma Information

  Asbestos-Mesothelioma Case Evaluation
Free.  Confidential.  No Obligation.

Filed Under: Asbestos Tagged With: asbestos, asbestos exposure, mesothelioma

Find What You Want Here

Get Free Case Evaluation

We encourage you to submit an online Case Evaluation Form – it is confidential and there is no obligation.

Or call our toll-free number, 800-426-9535, to speak directly to attorney Tom Lamb about your possible case.

Feel Free To Contact Us

Quick Contact Form
 
Send an Email to Tom Lamb

(800) 426-9535

Main Navigation Menu

  • About Our Firm
  • Asbestos-Mesothelioma Cases
  • Benzene Disease Claims
  • PFAS Firefighter Gear Lawsuits
  • Camp Lejeune Cases
  • GenX Water Cancer Cases
  • Drug Injury Lawsuits
  • Breast Implant Cancer Cases
  • Philips Breathing Devices Cases
  • Case Evaluation Menu
  • Quick Contact Form
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Medical Records Charges
  • Collection of Articles
  • Sitemap

Lamb Law Office Newsletter

Lamb Law Office Newsletter provides periodic updates about some of the cases that we are working on for clients, as well as an information resource you might find helpful.

Subscribe using Form below.

Subscription Form

* indicates required

Our Other Websites

Drug Injury Law
Drug Injury Watch
Drug Safety Developments
Asbestos & Mesothelioma

Contact Information

Law Offices of Thomas J. Lamb, P.A.
1908 Eastwood Road, Suite 225
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
910-256-2971 | 800-426-9535
TJL@LambLawOffice.com

  • Home
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Disclaimer and Copyright Notices

Copyright © 2023 · Law Offices of Thomas J. Lamb, P.A.